<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Legal Search Marketing &#187; Pay Per Click Marketing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/category/pay-per-click-marketing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing News for Lawyers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 22:28:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Yahoo / MSN Ad Center Transition</title>
		<link>http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/pay-per-click-marketing/yahoo-msn-ad-center-transition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/pay-per-click-marketing/yahoo-msn-ad-center-transition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 07:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Costa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MSN Adcenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay Per Click Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/?p=603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ive completed the first few accounts and transitioned from Yahoo search marketing over to the MSN adcenter and its a very simple process. In some cases you might not even need to do anything. If you already have a MSN adcenter account and have the same campaigns in both Msn and Yahoo, then there might [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ive completed the first few accounts and transitioned from Yahoo search marketing over to the MSN adcenter and its a very simple process.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-604" title="adcenter" src="http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/adcenter-300x117.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="117" /></p>
<p>In some cases you might not even need to do anything. If you already  have a MSN adcenter account and have the same campaigns in both Msn and  Yahoo, then there might not be much to do.   Yet if you dont have an ad  center account, or dont have the same campaigns setup in both Yahoo and  MSN, then you will need to do the transition and its pretty simple.</p>
<p>First you need to review the compatibility report and make edits. Then once you start the transition from within your Yahoo account, you will then login to your MSN adcenter account or create a new one. Then its just a matter of going through a series of screens that will pretty much guide you through adding the campaigns that you had in Yahoo into your MSN account.  Then you might need to fine tune them somewhat add tweak the bids, titles and descriptions of the ads.</p>
<p>You still need to manage your Yahoo ads though until sometime in late October. Once its complete, then you will just manage your campaigns from within MSN adcenter.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legalsearchmarketing.com%2Fpay-per-click-marketing%2Fyahoo-msn-ad-center-transition%2F&amp;title=Yahoo%20%2F%20MSN%20Ad%20Center%20Transition" id="wpa2a_2"><img src="http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/pay-per-click-marketing/yahoo-msn-ad-center-transition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yahoo PPC Advertisers, Begin Your Account Transitions</title>
		<link>http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/pay-per-click-marketing/yahoo-ppc-advertisers-begin-your-account-transitions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/pay-per-click-marketing/yahoo-ppc-advertisers-begin-your-account-transitions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 07:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Costa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MSN Adcenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay Per Click Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo Search Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/?p=600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you have a Yahoo Search Marketing Pay Per Click account, you need to transition the account over to the MSN adcenter.  Basically MSN is taking over all the Yahoo PPC campaigns and you will manage them from within MSN adcenter.  Yet you have to first login to your Yahoo account and review this compatibility [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have a <strong>Yahoo Search Marketing Pay Per Click</strong> account, you need to transition the account over to the MSN adcenter.  Basically MSN is taking over all the Yahoo PPC campaigns and you will manage them from within MSN adcenter.  Yet you have to first login to your Yahoo account and review this compatibility report for potential problems with your current campaigns.  Then they suggest that you make all these edits before you do the transition.  I will be doing the transitions soon and will blog about what to expect.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-601" title="searchalliance2" src="http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/searchalliance2.jpg" alt="" width="265" height="100" /></p>
<h3><em>From Yahoo Blog &#8212;&gt; </em><br />
You’ll be ready for the expected October move of Yahoo! Search ad serving to adCenter</h3>
<p><a title="Organic transition completed" href="http://www.ysmblog.com/blog/2010/08/24/yahoo-organic-search-transition-to-microsoft-now-complete/" target="_blank">Last week</a>,  we completed the transition of the back-end technology for  English-language Yahoo! organic search results in the U.S. and Canada.  This week, advertisers can start transitioning their paid Yahoo! Search  Marketing account, in anticipation of the Yahoo! ad serving transition  which we expect to start mid-October. We encourage you to transition  your account before the ad serving transition begins, so that you are  ready to reach more than 159 million searchers in the U.S. and 15  million searchers in Canada* on Yahoo! Search, Bing and our partners.</p>
<p><strong>Start your account transition now<br />
</strong>Beginning today, you may log in to your Yahoo! Search Marketing  account and initiate your transition to Microsoft Advertising adCenter.  We’ve created a detailed <a title="Transition Checklist" href="http://l.yimg.com/a/i/us/ayc/self_service_advertiser_transition_checklist_20100827.pdf" target="_blank">Transition Checklist</a> that you should review now, to help ensure that you’re prepared to make a smooth transition to adCenter, as well as a <a title="Feature Comparison Guide" href="http://l.yimg.com/a/i/us/ayc/feature_comparison_guide_20100827.pdf" target="_blank">Feature Comparison Guide</a>, to help you get familiar with adCenter’s features and capabilities.</p>
<p>There are three stages to completing your transition:</p>
<p><strong>1) Prepare your account for transition to adCenter<br />
</strong>When you log into your Yahoo! Search Marketing account, you’ll  automatically be taken to a new tab labeled “adCenter.” We recommend  that you review your Compatibility Report, and fix incompatibilities  between your current Yahoo! campaigns and the adCenter platform before  starting the transition to adCenter.</p>
<p><strong>2) Transition your account to adCenter</strong><br />
When you begin your transition, you’ll be able to create a new adCenter  account, or indicate that you have an existing adCenter account that you  want to continue to use. If you choose, you can use the transition tool  to copy your Yahoo! Search Marketing campaigns over to adCenter. Please  note that your campaigns will retain the same status (active or paused)  as they have within your Yahoo! account, so you may start incurring  click charges for Bing traffic right away.</p>
<p><strong>3) Continue to manage your Yahoo! Search Marketing account</strong><br />
The last stage in the transition process will occur when Yahoo! Search  ad serving moves to adCenter, which we expect to begin in mid-October  and be completed by the end of October. During this period, you should  expect traffic from your Yahoo! Search Marketing account to decrease,  and increase in your adCenter account. But until this process is  complete, you’ll still need to actively manage your Yahoo! Search  Marketing account to have your ads displayed on Yahoo! and our partner  sites.</p>
<p><strong>Commitment to quality continues<br />
</strong>Our primary goal remains providing you with a quality  transition experience in 2010, while protecting the holiday season.  While we are confident that the preparation work done to date and the  transition plan we are moving forward with now will help us reach this  goal, please remember that deferring the paid search transition to 2011  is still a possibility if we conclude it would improve the overall  experience.</p>
<p>We appreciate your business, and look forward to bringing you the benefits of the Yahoo! and Microsoft Search Alliance.</p>
<p><em>— The Team</em></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legalsearchmarketing.com%2Fpay-per-click-marketing%2Fyahoo-ppc-advertisers-begin-your-account-transitions%2F&amp;title=Yahoo%20PPC%20Advertisers%2C%20Begin%20Your%20Account%20Transitions" id="wpa2a_4"><img src="http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/pay-per-click-marketing/yahoo-ppc-advertisers-begin-your-account-transitions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Sends $750K Warning To Click Fraudsters</title>
		<link>http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/click-fraud/microsoft-sends-750k-warning-to-click-fraudsters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/click-fraud/microsoft-sends-750k-warning-to-click-fraudsters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 07:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Costa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Click Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay Per Click Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/?p=48</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York TImes reports Microsoft has filed suit against Eric Lam, Gordon Lam and Melanie Suen, of Vancouver, British Columbia. The suit comes after a year of investigative work by Microsoft in tracking down reports of click fraud. According to the NY Times, these defendants allegedly: Microsoft said it found a pattern of click [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New York TImes <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/16/business/media/16adco.html">reports</a><br />
Microsoft has filed suit against Eric Lam, Gordon Lam and Melanie Suen,<br />
of Vancouver, British Columbia. The suit comes after a year of<br />
investigative work by Microsoft in tracking down reports of click fraud.</p>
<p>According to the NY Times, these defendants allegedly:</p>
<p class="blockquote" style="text-align: left; margin-left: 40px;"><em>Microsoft said it found a pattern of click fraud on its search pages,<br />
where lists ranked by relevance and popularity appear alongside a<br />
handful of paid results. Advertisers bid on what they will pay to<br />
appear in the paid-search results for certain keywords. The more an<br />
advertiser pays, the higher they are in that list, and advertisers<br />
usually pay for each click on their ad.</em></p>
<p class="blockquote" style="text-align: left; margin-left: 40px;">
<p style="text-align: left;">Forum discussion at <a href="http://www.webmasterworld.com/msn_adcenter/3934288.htm">WebmasterWorld</a>.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legalsearchmarketing.com%2Fclick-fraud%2Fmicrosoft-sends-750k-warning-to-click-fraudsters%2F&amp;title=Microsoft%20Sends%20%24750K%20Warning%20To%20Click%20Fraudsters" id="wpa2a_6"><img src="http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/click-fraud/microsoft-sends-750k-warning-to-click-fraudsters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Aborts Yahoo deal That Sparked Fears of rising PPC Costs</title>
		<link>http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/pay-per-click-marketing/google-aborts-yahoo-deal-that-sparked-fears-of-rising-ppc-costs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/pay-per-click-marketing/google-aborts-yahoo-deal-that-sparked-fears-of-rising-ppc-costs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 05:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Costa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google AdWords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay Per Click Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo Search Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/?p=81</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google Inc. announced today it was dropping plans to provide some ads on Yahoo search results pages and publisher sites, laying to rest fears that the partnership would increase Google’s dominance in search marketing and lead to higher prices on pay-per-click ads. Since announcing plans for the partnership in June, Google and Yahoo Inc. have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="FONT-SIZE: 14px; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Google Inc. announced today it was dropping plans to provide some ads on Yahoo search results pages and publisher sites, laying to rest fears that the partnership would increase Google’s dominance in search marketing and lead to higher prices on pay-per-click ads. </span></p>
<p><span style="FONT-SIZE: 14px; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Since announcing plans for the partnership in June, Google and Yahoo Inc. have been negotiating with the government about possible modifications that would address objections from advertisers. “However, after four months of review, including discussions of various possible changes to the agreement, it’s clear that government regulators and some advertisers continue to have concerns about the agreement,” Google chief legal officer David Drummond said in a statement today. </span></p>
<p><span style="FONT-SIZE: 14px; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">The government made clear in its own statement that it viewed the proposed deal as anticompetitive. “The arrangement likely would have denied consumers the benefits of competition—lower prices, better service and greater innovation,” Thomas O. Barnett, the assistant attorney general who heads up the antitrust division of the Department of Justice, said in the statement. </span></p>
<p><span style="FONT-SIZE: 14px; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">In its own statement, Yahoo expressed disappointment over Google’s decision, but says the deal was only an add-on to Yahoo’s own product road map “and does not change Yahoo’s commitment to innovation and growth in search.” </span></p>
<p><span style="FONT-SIZE: 14px; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><strong>Google’s announcement is good news for search advertisers, says Mark Simon, vice president of industry relations at search marketing firm Didit LLC. “As Google’s reach in the search landscape has grown exponentially, it is important to the advertiser that there remains viable competition in this ecosystem,” Simon says. “Without having those options, we are all under the direct control of the lead horse.” He added his hope that Yahoo, the second-leading search engine, and No. 3 Microsoft Corp. “can help create this environment of choice for the marketer.”</strong> </span></p>
<p><span style="FONT-SIZE: 14px; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Search marketing firm SearchIgnite released a report in July saying that pay-per-click ad prices could go up as much as 22% as a result of the planned Google-Yahoo partnership.&#0160; <a href="http://www.internetretailer.com/dailyNews.asp?id=28369">Source</a></span></p>
<p><span style="FONT-SIZE: 14px; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><strong>Im not sure how much this would have raised any prices, I mean the bottom line here is that it would have just meant your Google adwords ads would now be shown on Yahoo sites, giving you more exposure at a higher cost.&#0160; It probably makes more sense to just open a Yahoo PPC account since the prices are usually cheaper at Yahoo per click.&#0160; </strong></span></p>
<p><span style="FONT-SIZE: 14px; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><strong>If your law firm is considering advertising online with Google, contact us for a <a href="http://www.lawyerscourt.com">free PPC&#0160;analysis</a>. We have helped many lawyers setup PPC programs at Google Adwords, Yahoo search marketing and MSN adcenter and have saved them all a lot of money.&#0160; PPC works because it can drive the types of clients your looking for directly to your website.</strong></span></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legalsearchmarketing.com%2Fpay-per-click-marketing%2Fgoogle-aborts-yahoo-deal-that-sparked-fears-of-rising-ppc-costs%2F&amp;title=Google%20Aborts%20Yahoo%20deal%20That%20Sparked%20Fears%20of%20rising%20PPC%20Costs" id="wpa2a_8"><img src="http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/pay-per-click-marketing/google-aborts-yahoo-deal-that-sparked-fears-of-rising-ppc-costs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Adwords &#8211; Adding &#8220;Negative&#8221; Keywords</title>
		<link>http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/pay-per-click-marketing/google-adwords-adding-negative-keywords/</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/pay-per-click-marketing/google-adwords-adding-negative-keywords/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 22:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Costa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google AdWords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay Per Click Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/?p=89</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Negative keywords are basically keywords you don&#8217;t want showing up for searches that bring up your ad.&#160; So if you were bidding on the broad match term of New York Lawyers, your sites ad could come up for many different variations of that term.&#160; &#160;If your law firm doesn&#8217;t handle personal injury cases, then it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">Negative keywords are basically keywords you don&#8217;t want showing up for searches that bring up your ad.&nbsp; </p>
<p>So if you were bidding on the broad match term of New York Lawyers, your sites ad could come up for many different variations of that term.&nbsp; &nbsp;If your law firm doesn&#8217;t handle personal injury cases, then it might make sense to make sure your ad didn&#8217;t show when someone did the search of New York Accident Lawyers. </p>
<p>So if you add the negative keyword (-new york accident lawyer) to that campaign, then that keyword will never trigger your ad and you won&#8217;t be paying for that potential click from someone who was looking for something your law firm doesn&#8217;t handle.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 1.2em;"><strong>What are negative keywords? </strong></span>
</p>
<div class="i">
<p><span style="font-size: 1.2em;"><strong>I. Definition</strong></span>
</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">Negative keywords are a core component of a successful keyword list. Adding a<br />
negative keyword to your ad group or campaign means that your ads won&#8217;t show for<br />
search queries containing that term. By filtering out unwanted impressions,<br />
negative keywords can help you reach the most appropriate prospects, reduce your<br />
cost-per-click (CPC), and increase your ROI.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 1.2em;"><strong>II. Example</strong></span>
</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">The negative keyword <em>–free trial</em> would prevent your ads from showing<br />
on any search queries containing the terms <em>free</em> and <em>trial</em>. It<br />
wouldn&#8217;t prevent your ads from showing on variations of these terms, however. It<br />
also wouldn&#8217;t prevent your ads from showing on search queries that only contain<br />
one of the terms.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">For instance, the search queries <em>one-day trial</em> and <em>free<br />
test</em> could trigger your ads, while <em>free one-day trial</em> could not.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 1.2em;"><strong>III. How to use them</strong></span>
</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">The process to <a href="/support/bin/answer.py?answer=6635">add negative<br />
keywords</a> to your ad group is just like adding any other keyword. The only<br />
difference is that you put a negative sign (–) before the term. You can also add<br />
negative keywords at the campaign level. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 1.2em;"><br /><strong>The bottom line is that when most people add keywords to their Google adwords campaign, they add a broad match keyword and that means many different variations of the keyword can trigger your ad, this can mean more traffic but it also can mean a lower click through rate and maybe people clicking on your ad that aren&#8217;t really interested in your service. </strong></p>
<p>You could always add an Exact match, which means the term of [New York Lawyers] would only trigger your ad if that exact term was typed in.&nbsp; Yet that would then limit the amount of times your ad was shown. </p>
<p>So adding negative keywords is a way to get more traffic but limit certain terms that you know for sure don&#8217;t make sense to your business. </p>
<p>Google Adwords has a couple of great ideas to generate the lists of potential negative keywords, below is one way to find them and add them to your campaign.</p>
<p>*******************</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 1.2em;"><strong>To use the Keyword Tool to generate potential negative keywords:</strong><br />
</span></p>
<ol>
<li><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">Sign in to your AdWords account at <a href="/select/">https://adwords.google.com</a>.<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">Click the campaign and the ad group that you&#8217;d like to edit.<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">Select the <strong>Keywords</strong> tab.<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">Click <strong>Keyword tool</strong>.<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">Enter a generic term related to your product or business (generally a<br />
one-word term) in the available field.<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">Click <strong>Get Keyword Ideas</strong>.<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">Check the <strong>Keyword</strong> column for any search queries that are<br />
irrelevant to your product or business and that you wouldn&#8217;t want triggering<br />
your ads.<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">Click the downward-pointing arrow in the <strong>Match Type</strong> column<br />
for each keyword that you want to add as a negative match. Select<br />
<strong>Negative</strong>, and the term will be added to your list as negative<br />
keyword.<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">Click <strong>Save to Ad Group</strong> when you&#8217;re done.</span></li>
</ol>
</div>
<p><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">This makes a lot of sense and is a way to fine tune your campaigns so you don&#8217;t overspend on your online advertising.</p>
<p>We have helped many lawyers succeed with their Internet PPC campaigns at Google adwords, Yahoo search marketing and other PPC programs.&nbsp; If we can be of service to your law firm with <a href="http://www.lawyerscourt.com/payperclick.html">legal PPC</a>o or attorney organic SEO campaigns, please <a href="http://www.lawyerscourt.com/contactus.html">contact us for a free estimate</a>.&nbsp; &nbsp;</span></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legalsearchmarketing.com%2Fpay-per-click-marketing%2Fgoogle-adwords-adding-negative-keywords%2F&amp;title=Google%20Adwords%20%26%238211%3B%20Adding%20%26%238220%3BNegative%26%238221%3B%20Keywords" id="wpa2a_10"><img src="http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/pay-per-click-marketing/google-adwords-adding-negative-keywords/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Saving Money at Pay Per Click is Good, Getting top 10 Organic Rankings is Better</title>
		<link>http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/legal-internet-marketing/saving-money-at-pay-per-click-is-good-getting-top-10-organic-rankings-is-better/</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/legal-internet-marketing/saving-money-at-pay-per-click-is-good-getting-top-10-organic-rankings-is-better/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 02:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Costa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Internet Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal SEO Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organic Search Engine Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay Per Click Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/?p=102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few backs I blogged about the importance of making sure that your Google Adwords campaign is properly optimized.&#160; Many times lawyers will create an Adwords campaign and not really pay attention to it or use the Pay Per Clicks search engines optimization suggestions, which can result in you paying a lot more money then [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">A few backs I blogged about the importance of making sure that your <a href="http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/2008/03/how-we-saved-on.html">Google Adwords campaign is properly optimized</a>.&nbsp; </p>
<p>Many times lawyers will create an Adwords campaign and not really pay attention to it or use the Pay Per Clicks search engines optimization suggestions, which can result in you paying a lot more money then you should.&nbsp; We will easily save this client at least $3,000 a month, if not more as a result of reviewing and adjusting his campaigns. </p>
<p><strong>TOP 10 ORGANIC RESULTS ARE VALUABLE</strong><br />More important though is having top 10 organic results at Google for the same keywords your bidding on via Pay Per Click.&nbsp; The best thing about the organic listings are they are free!&nbsp; &nbsp;So if your paying $20 per click on average and you get 100 visitors for the month via the organic listings, that would value your organic listing at $2,000 each month and thats just for one keyphrase.</p>
<p><strong>SAVE MONEY AT PPC &amp; GET TOP 10 ORGANIC RANKINGS</strong><br />The same <a href="http://www.waldbaumlaw.com/" class="broken_link">Massachusetts Drunk Driving Lawyer</a> that we helped save money on the Pay per click ads, we have now also gotten him top 10 rankings at Google organics for many of the same terms he is bidding on.&nbsp; Some of the terms are&nbsp; <br />- Massachusetts OUI (#6)<br />- OUI Lawyers Mass (#4)<br /></span><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">- Massachusetts DUI (#6)<br />- Massachusetts DWI (#8) <br />- Massachusetts Drunk Driving Lawyers (#8)</p>
<p>I already see an increase in traffic from the organic listings. So as a result of our Internet Marketing work, the client has not only saved over $3000 a month but now has many top 10 organic listings and is now getting more traffic and visitors then ever before, which will result in more clients. </p>
<p>If we can be of assistance to your legal practice, with either pay per click marketing or organic optimization, please <a href="http://www.lawyerscourt.com">contact us</a>. <br />  </span></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legalsearchmarketing.com%2Flegal-internet-marketing%2Fsaving-money-at-pay-per-click-is-good-getting-top-10-organic-rankings-is-better%2F&amp;title=Saving%20Money%20at%20Pay%20Per%20Click%20is%20Good%2C%20Getting%20top%2010%20Organic%20Rankings%20is%20Better" id="wpa2a_12"><img src="http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/legal-internet-marketing/saving-money-at-pay-per-click-is-good-getting-top-10-organic-rankings-is-better/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How To Save a Client $200 on Day 1 and $1000 in Week 1 with Google Adwords</title>
		<link>http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/legal-internet-marketing/how-to-save-a-client-200-on-day-1-and-1000-in-week-1-with-google-adwords/</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/legal-internet-marketing/how-to-save-a-client-200-on-day-1-and-1000-in-week-1-with-google-adwords/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Costa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google AdWords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Internet Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay Per Click Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/?p=104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Usually when I take over pay per click accounts, the person is usually overpaying for visitors to their sites. Ive had many occasions where the person is paying $20 or more to much per click, usually because they set one high amount for their max bid on all keywords.  If you say you will bid [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">Usually when I take over pay per click accounts, the person is usually overpaying for visitors to their sites. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">Ive had many occasions where the person is paying $20 or more to much per click, usually because they set one high amount for their max bid on all keywords.  If you say you will bid a max of $60 per click, there&#8217;s a good chance you will and that can really add up.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">In the case of this client, who is a Boston criminal Dui lawyer, he was paying a high amount per click so that he could be at the top of the sponsored matches. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 1.2em;"><strong>$25 A CLICK SAVINGS IN FIRST WEEK, $1000 SAVED</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">You can see in the chart below that <strong>on Feb.12, 2008 he was paying on average $35.83 per click</strong> and he was on average in position 1.3. Yet on Feb. 14 the first full day after I took over and made changes, <strong>he got the same # of clicks but was only paying $10.69 per click </strong>and the only downfall, is he slipped to ad position 2.3, no big deal but what a savings of $25 per click. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">Then if you look at the totals for the first week where I took over compared to the first 10 days of February, <strong>we got more clicks for over $1,000 less.</strong> This is only one campaign of 5, so just a portion of the overall savings<strong>.</strong> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 1.2em;"><strong>Looking at the amount spent on 2007 ($45,000</strong>+) we would wind up saving the client over $25,000 at least just for this one campaign, and probably wind up getting more clicks. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">Part of the reason he is getting more clicks for less is because when you set your bid to high, you might meet your daily budget much quicker, so your ads will be taken down until the next day. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">Here are the stats for the first 7 days of when I took over, the 10 days prior and then the totals for Jan. 2008 and the entire 2007.</span></p>
<table border="1" width="60%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">DATE RANGE:</span></strong></td>
<td width="140"><strong><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">CLICKS</span></strong></td>
<td width="151"><strong><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">IMPRESSIONS</span></strong></td>
<td width="118"><strong><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">AVG. CPC</span></strong></td>
<td width="146"><strong><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">TOTAL COST</span></strong></td>
<td width="118"><strong><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">AVG. POSITION</span></strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">FEB. 12, 2008</span></td>
<td width="140"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">8</span></td>
<td width="151"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">864</span></td>
<td width="118"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">$35.83</span></td>
<td width="146"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">$286.67</span></td>
<td width="118"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">1.3</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">FEB. 13, 2008</span></td>
<td width="140"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">2</span></td>
<td width="151"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">504</span></td>
<td width="118"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">$ 3.27</span></td>
<td width="146"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">$ 6.54</span></td>
<td width="118"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">1.8</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">FEB. 14, 2008</span></td>
<td width="140"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">8</span></td>
<td width="151"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">1609</span></td>
<td width="118"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">$10.69</span></td>
<td width="146"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">$ 85.49</span></td>
<td width="118"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">2.3</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">FEB. 15, 2008</span></td>
<td width="140"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">7</span></td>
<td width="151"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">1135</span></td>
<td width="118"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">$10.23</span></td>
<td width="146"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">$71.59</span></td>
<td width="118"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">2.9</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">FEB. 16, 2008</span></td>
<td width="140"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">12</span></td>
<td width="151"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">711</span></td>
<td width="118"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">$ 8.46</span></td>
<td width="146"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">$ 101.51</span></td>
<td width="118"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">3.0</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">FEB. 17, 2008</span></td>
<td width="140"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">18</span></td>
<td width="151"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">543</span></td>
<td width="118"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">$ 7.08</span></td>
<td width="146"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">$ 127.44</span></td>
<td width="118"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">2.7</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">FEB. 18, 2008</span></td>
<td width="140"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">14</span></td>
<td width="151"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">675</span></td>
<td width="118"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">$ 8.14</span></td>
<td width="146"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">$ 113.91</span></td>
<td width="118"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">2.5</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td width="140"></td>
<td width="151"></td>
<td width="118"></td>
<td width="146"></td>
<td width="118"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">TOTALS (2/12 &#8211; 2/18/08)</span></strong></td>
<td width="140"><strong><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">69</span></strong></td>
<td width="151"><strong><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">6,141</span></strong></td>
<td width="118"><strong><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">$11.49</span></strong></td>
<td width="146"><strong><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">$793.15</span></strong></td>
<td width="118"><strong><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">2.4</span></strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td width="140"></td>
<td width="151"></td>
<td width="118"></td>
<td width="146"></td>
<td width="118"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">TOTALS (2/1 &#8211; 2/10/08)</span></strong><strong><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">PRIOR TO MY DOING THE UPDATES</span></strong></td>
<td width="140"><strong><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">65</span></strong></td>
<td width="151"><strong><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">2,926</span></strong></td>
<td width="118"><strong><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">$28.84</span></strong></td>
<td width="146"><strong><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">$1,874.37</span></strong></td>
<td width="118"><strong><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">1.3</span></strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td width="140"></td>
<td width="151"></td>
<td width="118"></td>
<td width="146"></td>
<td width="118"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">TOTALS (1/1 &#8211; 1/31/08)</span></strong></td>
<td width="140"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">253</span></td>
<td width="151"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">11,600</span></td>
<td width="118"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">$29.60</span></td>
<td width="146"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">$7,489</span></td>
<td width="118"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">1.2</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">TOTALS 2007</span></strong></td>
<td width="140"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">1,885</span></td>
<td width="151"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">93,634</span></td>
<td width="118"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">$24.77</span></td>
<td width="146"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">$45,942</span></td>
<td width="118"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">1.3</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">These are some huge savings and it won&#8217;t always be that much but usually I find that there&#8217;s always some room for improvement on pay per click campaigns. You really have to pay attention to them and track the progress and it helps to hire someone who does it all the time.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">If we can assist your law firm with pay per click marketing,</span><a href="http://www.lawyerscourt.com/contactus.html"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;"> contact us today</span></a><span style="font-size: 1.2em;"> and we will review your campaigns and help save you money.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">We will be helping this client <strong>save even more money</strong> once we do his <strong>organic optimization</strong> work. <strong>It makes sense to have top 10 rankings for keywords your bidding over $25 per click on</strong>! Once that is achieved, then you can reduce the amount spent on pay per click. </span></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legalsearchmarketing.com%2Flegal-internet-marketing%2Fhow-to-save-a-client-200-on-day-1-and-1000-in-week-1-with-google-adwords%2F&amp;title=How%20To%20Save%20a%20Client%20%24200%20on%20Day%201%20and%20%241000%20in%20Week%201%20with%20Google%20Adwords" id="wpa2a_14"><img src="http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/legal-internet-marketing/how-to-save-a-client-200-on-day-1-and-1000-in-week-1-with-google-adwords/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Click Fraud Article</title>
		<link>http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/pay-per-click-marketing/click-fraud-article/</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/pay-per-click-marketing/click-fraud-article/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 05:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Costa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pay Per Click Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/?p=137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Marshall and Eric Enge Talk About Click Fraud Clicktracks is well known as a significant player in the analytics space, and is in particular well known for the click fraud analysis tools that they provide to their clients as part of that package. Recently the Clicktracks CEO, John Marshall, and I spoke about click [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">John Marshall and Eric Enge Talk About Click Fraud</span></em></strong></p>
<p><em></em></p>
<p><em><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">Clicktracks is well known as a significant player in the analytics space, and is in particular well known for the click fraud analysis tools that they provide to their clients as part of that package. Recently the Clicktracks CEO, </span></em><a href="http://www.stonetemple.com/podcasts/John-Marshall-Podcast-030807.shtml"><em><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">John Marshall, and I spoke about click fraud</span></em></a><em><span style="font-size: 1.2em;"> in a podcast we did together.</span></em></p>
<p><em><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">John provides an excellent overview of what click fraud really is, how pervasive it is, and what the search engines are doing about it. For example, John outlines that click fraud affects sites in a very random manner, where some sites are hit very hard by it, and others not at all. John also indicates that the problem is much worse in very competitive markets.</span></em></p>
<p><em><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">When I asked John if the search engines were doing enough to combat click fraud, he provided an answer that will surprise most people (the answer was &quot;yes&quot;). John is not minimizing click fraud when he says this. He is simply saying that it is incumbent on the advertiser to play an active role in combatting click fraud as well.</span></em></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">Click fraud does exist and you have to monitor your pay per click campaigns and pay attention, otherwise your going to wind up paying a lot more in the long run.&nbsp; </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">The better investment for the long run is to make sure your website is setup to be well ranked in the organic listings. No need to worry about click fraud then!</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">SOURCE: </span><a href="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">Search Engine Watch</span></a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legalsearchmarketing.com%2Fpay-per-click-marketing%2Fclick-fraud-article%2F&amp;title=Click%20Fraud%20Article" id="wpa2a_16"><img src="http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/pay-per-click-marketing/click-fraud-article/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Shares More Click Fraud Numbers</title>
		<link>http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/pay-per-click-marketing/google-shares-more-click-fraud-numbers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/pay-per-click-marketing/google-shares-more-click-fraud-numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 21:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Costa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google AdWords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay Per Click Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo Search Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/?p=138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Invalid clicks on Google AdWords ads have consistently remained under the 10-percent mark, and are generally in low single-digits, Google revealed. In addition, the amount of invalid clicks that are not proactively detected and are caught by advertisers is less than 0.02 percent, according to Google&#8217;s Shuman Ghosemajumder. Google advertisers have been clamoring for a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">Invalid clicks on Google AdWords ads have consistently remained under the 10-percent mark, and are generally in low single-digits, Google </span><a href="http://adwords.blogspot.com/2007/02/invalid-clicks-googles-overall-numbers.html"><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">revealed</span></a><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">. In addition, the amount of invalid clicks that are not proactively detected and are caught by advertisers is less than 0.02 percent, according to Google&#8217;s Shuman Ghosemajumder.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">Google advertisers have been clamoring for a hard number to put on click fraud for years, but Google has been unwilling to share specifics. The company has often said that revealing too much would make it easier for fraudsters to take advantage of the system, which has frustrated advertisers who want to know where their money is going.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">This revelation is the latest in a series of moves designed to offer more transparency to advertisers, Ghosemajumder said. Google has come under fire from lawsuits, click fraud reporting firms, and advertisers in recent months, all looking for more granular details on the level of invalid clicks occurring in the AdWords system.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">Google is also undertaking several more click fraud-related initiatives in coming months. Among these are IP Filtering capabilities for advertisers, enhanced invalid click reports, educational initiatives, and an improved reporting format. The first three initiatives are expected to roll out this month, while the improved reporting format will come later this year, he said.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 1.2em;">SOURCE: <a href="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/">Search Engine Watch</a> </span></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legalsearchmarketing.com%2Fpay-per-click-marketing%2Fgoogle-shares-more-click-fraud-numbers%2F&amp;title=Google%20Shares%20More%20Click%20Fraud%20Numbers" id="wpa2a_18"><img src="http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/pay-per-click-marketing/google-shares-more-click-fraud-numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arkansas judge finalizes Google &#8220;click&#8221; settlement</title>
		<link>http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/pay-per-click-marketing/arkansas-judge-finalizes-google-click-settlement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/pay-per-click-marketing/arkansas-judge-finalizes-google-click-settlement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 06:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Costa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pay Per Click Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/?p=161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TEXARKANA, Ark., July 27 (Reuters) &#8211; An Arkansas state judge on Wednesday granted final approval to a class-action settlement between Google Inc. and advertisers who alleged Google allowed third parties to drive up fees by fraudulent use of its Web search advertising system. Judge Joe Griffin of the Circuit Court of Miller County, Arkansas made [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>TEXARKANA, Ark., July 27 (Reuters) &#8211; An Arkansas state judge on Wednesday granted final approval to a class-action settlement between Google Inc. </em><em>and advertisers who alleged Google allowed third parties to drive up fees by fraudulent use of its Web search advertising system.</em></p>
<p><em>Judge Joe Griffin of the Circuit Court of Miller County, Arkansas made no changes in approving the settlement, which calls for Google to pay up to $90 million in online credits to customers and legal fees, according to court documents.</em></p>
<p><em>The Google settlement hearing is part of a broader legal action by plaintiff Lane&#8217;s Gifts and Collectibles originally filed in February 2005 against Internet advertising industry players over the issue of so-called &quot;click fraud&quot;.</em></p>
<p><em>SOURCE : <a href="http://yahoo.reuters.com/news/articlehybrid.aspx?storyID=urn:newsml:reuters.com:20060727:MTFH47226_2006-07-27_17-54-26_N27466219&amp;type=comktNews&amp;rpc=44">REUTERS NEWS</a></em></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.legalsearchmarketing.com%2Fpay-per-click-marketing%2Farkansas-judge-finalizes-google-click-settlement%2F&amp;title=Arkansas%20judge%20finalizes%20Google%20%26%238220%3Bclick%26%238221%3B%20settlement" id="wpa2a_20"><img src="http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalsearchmarketing.com/pay-per-click-marketing/arkansas-judge-finalizes-google-click-settlement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

